Like any
research released about children with autism, the report sparked some intense
debate. One reason for the controversy is that many parents say that
restrictive diets have helped their children by combating symptoms and behavior
problems of autistic children. What’s important to note however, is that the
panel did acknowledge in their report that many parents and medical
professionals have reported improvements in autistic behaviors after dietary
treatment, but that these observations aren't based on controlled, scientific
studies. In other words, they are anecdotal. Many parents try the restrictive
diets after hearing anecdotes from other parents but this is not proof enough
for scientists and doctors. Additionally, usually these children are receiving
other treatments (i.e. special education, speech therapy, behavior
intervention, etc.) which only confounds the conclusion that the diets are the
sole responsible, or responsible at all for the improvements.
Based on
the research, the panel concluded that there is still no proof that special
diets help or don't help autistic kids -- or that food allergies, food sensitivities, or gut problems cause autism.
Harvard's Timothy Buie, MD and chair of the panel noted "Anecdotal reports that restricted diets may ameliorate symptoms
of ASDs in some children have not been supported or refuted in the scientific
literature, but these data do not address the possibility that there exists a
subgroup of individuals who may respond to such diets."
Bottom
line? Because of the anecdotal evidence, a parent with a child with autism may
be inclined to try a special diet. But as with any alternative treatment, we
strongly recommended that a child following a restricted diet be carefully
monitored by a nutritionist and a medical professional.
No comments:
Post a Comment